World Heritage in Iran

Perspectives on Pasargadae

What This Book Really Is

World Heritage in Iran: Perspectives on Pasargadae is a book about an ancient site, but even more than that it is a book about how ancient sites live in the present. The editor, Ali Mozaffari, begins by arguing that Pasargadae is often trapped inside narrow disciplinary readings. Archaeologists study monuments, art historians study forms, and heritage professionals study management systems, but none of those alone can explain what Pasargadae actually is as a lived and contested place. That opening move is crucial because it defines the whole collection. The book is trying to see Pasargadae as archaeology, politics, landscape, tourism, local life, and world heritage all at once.

That matters because Pasargadae is not a neutral ruin. The site includes the tomb of Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, and for that reason it has been drawn into very modern arguments about Iranian identity, monarchy, nationalism, Islamism, development, and the politics of memory. Mozaffari points out that the Pahlavi monarchy used it as a legitimating symbol, while the Islamic Republic first treated it with coldness and then gradually reabsorbed it into national discourse. The book therefore starts with a very important claim: heritage sites do not merely preserve the past. They actively reorganize the present.

The Book’s Larger Argument

The central argument of the volume is that Pasargadae should be understood as a multiple place. Mozaffari says it is imagined differently by different groups, including the state, non-state actors, villagers, tourists, nomads, archaeologists, industrial interests, and heritage activists. This is one of the strongest ideas in the book because it stops the reader from imagining Pasargadae as a single stable object. Instead, it becomes a layered field of meanings. A World Heritage site is not only a monument or a legal status. It is a place where many claims meet.

This broader conception also allows the book to escape the usual dead end of heritage politics. Mozaffari says that simply examining state-level politics is not enough, because that tends to reify the site again and ignore everyday life. What matters is not only what governments say Pasargadae means, but how the site is embedded in nearby villages, sacred understandings, tourism flows, development pressures, archaeological practice, and national feeling. That is what gives the book its richness.

Structure and Why It Works

The structure of the collection is one of its strongest features. The opening conceptual chapter sets up Pasargadae as a place rather than only an object of study. The next chapters move into archaeology and heritage management. Then the volume widens out into knowledge production, temporality, rural context, tourism, poetics, museum questions, and the Sivand Dam controversy. This is a very smart sequence because it gradually thickens the site. By the end, Pasargadae feels less like a fixed archaeological zone and more like a cultural landscape shaped by overlapping temporalities and interests.

Early-Book Strength: The Site as Place, Not Monument

The first chapter is probably the most conceptually important. Mozaffari explains that when a site becomes World Heritage, large bureaucratic structures take over and often alienate it from its local context. He warns that abstract heritage values can reduce a living place to monuments that provide a romanticized picture of the past. Pasargadae, he argues, has experienced exactly this kind of reduction. But it is also a place with villagers, nomads, tourists, and local sacred associations. That framing is powerful because it gives the whole book a critical edge without becoming anti-heritage.

This chapter also tracks how Pasargadae changed meaning over time. In the early Islamic period, the Achaemenid identity of the site faded and the tomb of Cyrus was reinterpreted as belonging to the Mother of Solomon. Only in the twentieth century did archaeological identification firmly reconnect the site with Cyrus. That historical layering is important because it shows that contested meaning is not a recent accident. Pasargadae has been reimagined for centuries.

Archaeology and Management

The archaeological chapter by Rémy Boucharlat seems to provide the historical backbone of the collection. It traces how Pasargadae was gradually recognized, recorded, excavated, and reinterpreted, and explains that our understanding of its original function has changed significantly over time. This helps anchor the book, because without archaeology the later heritage and political chapters would float free of the site’s material reality.

The heritage-management chapter then brings the discussion into the present. The list of figures for that chapter alone shows the concerns clearly: core and buffer zones, administrative structures, conservation priorities, monitoring, funding, education, and village development along access routes. Even from the front matter, it is obvious that Pasargadae is not simply managed as a passive ruin. It is an actively governed World Heritage environment.

Middle-Book Strength: Local Context and Tourism

One of the most valuable-looking middle chapters is the one on Pasargadae’s present rural context. The book insists that the site cannot be understood without the nearby villages, clan relations, agricultural and domestic life, and local symbolic meanings. This is a major strength because many heritage studies of famous places still write as if local communities exist only as background. Here, the rural context is part of the site’s reality, not an external add-on.

The tourism chapter appears equally important. It explains that Pasargadae is not run simply to maximize profit but has to balance multiple policy demands. It also notes the tension between conservation and tourism and the challenge of ensuring that surrounding communities actually benefit from the site’s iconic status. The chapter notes that when Pasargadae was listed in 2004, the nearby villages had low levels of development and little tourism infrastructure. This gives the tourism question a real social dimension: World Heritage prestige does not automatically produce local gain.

That chapter also highlights a deeper tension in heritage tourism everywhere. Managers must protect the site, welcome visitors, and navigate political symbolism at the same time. In the case of Pasargadae, those tensions are heightened by the site’s associations with pre-revolutionary monarchy, Persian nationalism, domestic tourism, and international attraction. That makes the book’s tourism discussion much more interesting than a standard visitor-management chapter.

The Museum and Poetics

The chapter on poetics is one of the more unusual-looking contributions. Instead of focusing only on protection or policy, it asks how Pasargadae might be interpreted through poetic experience and the senses. That suggests a different approach to heritage interpretation, one less dependent on signage and chronology and more open to atmosphere, memory, and affect. This helps the collection avoid becoming overly technocratic.

The unfinished museum chapter seems equally revealing. The museum is not treated as a simple building project, but as a symbol of how heritage ambitions can remain materially unresolved. Even the title, “The (Unfinished) Museum at Pasargadae,” suggests the volume’s broader theme: World Heritage is always part aspiration, part institution, part incompletion.

Late-Book Strength: The Sivand Dam Controversy

The Sivand Dam chapter is probably the most dramatic late-book contribution and one of the clearest demonstrations of the volume’s central argument. The dam was located close enough to Pasargadae and Persepolis to trigger intense protest, debate, media campaigns, open letters, public meetings, and nationalist mobilization. The chapter explains that Sivand Dam sits about 17 kilometres from Pasargadae and that the Bolaghi gorge it affected had archaeological significance of its own, including association with the ancient Royal Road.

What makes this chapter especially valuable is that it does not reduce the controversy to a simple good-versus-bad story. It shows supporters of the dam emphasizing flooding control, agricultural protection, drought prevention, and village livelihoods, while opponents emphasized heritage destruction, environmental damage, humidity risk, incomplete archaeological work, and mistrust of official information. This complexity is exactly what the whole book wants us to see: heritage sites are not merely threatened by development in the abstract. They are caught in conflicts among real and competing forms of value.

The media and activism detail also matters. The chapter records proclamations, open letters, street protests, fake images, websites, text-message campaigns, and the involvement of NGOs, academics, and political groups. This shows how Pasargadae became a site not just of archaeology, but of networked public politics. Heritage was mobilized as identity, alarm, protest, and symbol.

What the Book Does Especially Well

The biggest strength of the collection is that it refuses to simplify Pasargadae. Many books on famous sites either celebrate their ancient grandeur or focus narrowly on management. This one does something better. It shows the site as ancient capital, sacred landscape, archaeological field, heritage bureaucracy, rural environment, tourism challenge, unfinished museum, and media controversy all at once. That makes the book feel genuinely interdisciplinary rather than just multi-authored.

A second strength is that the book takes local and present-day life seriously. Villagers, nomads, property values, migration, infrastructure, and everyday use are not treated as distractions from heritage. They are central to the story. That makes the volume much more convincing as a study of place.

Final Judgment

My judgment is strongly positive. World Heritage in Iran: Perspectives on Pasargadae looks like a thoughtful and genuinely useful collection because it explains why a World Heritage site is never just a collection of monuments. It is a place where archaeology, identity, state power, local life, tourism, development, and memory all meet. Its strongest achievement is that it turns Pasargadae from an iconic ruin into a complex living landscape.

Command Palette